Friday, April 01, 2005

St. Theresa Schiavo

Jewish World Review April 1, 2005

Cal Thomas, Jewish World Review

Theresa "Terri" Schiavo, who was confined to a hospital bed, unable to speak and condemned to death by federal courts that refused to intervene to save her life, has been transported to a new life where she will be able to communicate in a powerful new way. She will quickly become a saint to the pro-life movement as well as a metaphor for what is wrong with our federal and many state courts. Possibly her death might add momentum to President Bush's quest to get judges confirmed who believe in the fundamental right to life for all categories of human existence, instead of judicial freelancers who speak of a "living Constitution" even while they arrogantly preside over a prejudicial reading of that document and sentence new categories of life to death.

While opinion polls showed overwhelming majorities in favor of "pulling the plug" on Terri Schiavo, it appears that despite extensive coverage of her condition, many Americans did not fully comprehend significant details of this case or fully appreciate where it will lead.

This will not be the end of such cases, but the beginning, or more accurately, a continuation on the line of death that began in the womb in 1973 with Roe v. Wade and will now quickly advance toward the "retirement" villages. The angel of death that moved through ancient Egypt at the first Passover was called "the destroyer." Our courts are his modern incarnation.

No life is safe because every life now depends on the whims, desires, comfort level and pleasure of others. From an "endowed" right to life, we have quickly moved to a court-imputed right to die. Increasingly we do not speak of life at all, but death. America truly is, as the suffering Pope John Paul II has described it, a "culture of death."

In the immediate aftermath of her death, there was a dispute between the Schindler and Schiavo families about access to Terri in her final moments. When the focus is on death and not life, it is difficult to detect common decency's pulse.

In commenting on Terri's death, President Bush, who signed legislation that attempted to keep her alive, said, "The essence of civilization is that the strong have a duty to protect the weak." Duty? Who speaks of such things today? Didn't Michael Schiavo have a duty to protect his wife instead of abandoning her and fathering two children by a woman to whom he was not married? How sick is that? Had Terri been given an MRI or PET scan that proved she was effectively "brain dead," the controversy might have ended.

This case will serve as a rallying cry for pro-lifers and other social conservatives. Expect "Remember Terri Schiavo" bumper stickers to appear soon. Expect conservative Republicans to make her death part of the campaign to win approval of federal judges. Watch liberal Democrats squirm, though some of them voted, along with conservatives, for the bill granting power to the federal courts to consider Terri's case. That judges refused to save her, or even grant a hearing to consider new facts, is another blot on the federal judiciary. It is a stain that won't be removed until those responsible are replaced.

There is another possibility. What if the polls are right and the public sees the removal of Terri's feeding tube as an act of mercy and not murder? What then? In that case, we will know that the problem is not at the top — with judges and politicians — but in ourselves. We will see that our leadership merely reflects the secret desires of most hearts to worship the g-d of materialism, personal peace and pleasure. In that case, we will be getting our just deserts as courts — at the urging of relatives wishing to preserve their inheritance or be relieved of "burdens"— dispatch the angel of death to more of us who are not ready to die.

Meanwhile, "St. Theresa" speaks. How many will hear? As singer Don McLean put it in another context: "They would not listen, they're not listening still; perhaps they never will."



VOX POPULI = BLOGGERS (Dialogue taken from the movie Network, Paddy Chayefsky (1976)

Howard Beale: We deal in illusions, man. None of it is true. But you people sit there day after day, night after night, all ages, colors, creeds. We're all you know. You're beginning to believe the illusions we're spinning here. You're beginning to think that the tube [blog]is reality and that your own lives are unreal. You do whatever the tube [blog] tells you. You dress like the tube [blog]. You eat like the tube [blog]. You even think like the tube. [WEB LOG! CABLE! IP! WI-FI! LEXAPRO! TOPAMAX! What clients? What product launch? No one reads this anyway. WHERE IS MY JAVA? where is my hollywood reporter?] In God's name, you people are the real thing, WE are the [bloggers] illusion.


UPI: Blogger Guckert/Gannon non-profit/GOP link being checked out -- news appears in RIGHT WING RAG!


I found this in the Washington Times -- of all places! But messing with 501 C3's is dangerous biz-ness. I worked enough with Morris A. Nunes, Esq. to know all about it!--Kilroy2005

Blog: Guckert/Gannon non-profit/GOP link

Washington, DC, Mar. 31 (UPI) -- Former Talon News White House correspondent J.D. Guckert reportedly is implicated in falsely registering a political organization as a non-profit document.

The Weblog dailyKos.com reported Thursday that Guckert, aka Jeff Gannon, who quit his job for the online publisher Talon News after media reports tied him to gay online prostitution and Republican Party operatives, was registered as the executive director of an organization called the Free Speech Foundation.

The Free Speech Foundation was registered as a tax-exempt non-profit with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service under code 501(c)(3), which prohibits the organizations from participating in or funding political activities.

Despite this, dailyKos.com charged, the organization was used to fundraise for a pro-Bush Web site, ProBush.com, that was facing a $5 million libel suit for naming an Arab-American senator on its ongoing "Traitor List."

Under his pen name Gannon, Guckert subsequently wrote an article about the lawsuit for Talon News, without disclosing his organization -- FSF -- had created a PayPal online fundraising account for a legal defense fund for ProBush.com's publishers, dailyKos.com said.

Guckert, however, dismissed the allegations and said dailyKos.com had "an extreme left-wing" bent.

The Free Speech Foundation is "entirely legitimate," Guckert told UPI. "It complies with IRS rules and regulations.


Copyright 2005 United Press International

David Corn nails it. The exploitation of Terri Schiavo


Terri Schiavo Is Dead ... And What Remains
By David Corn, DavidCorn.com. Posted March 31, 2005.

I don't think we should forget how certain scoundrels crassly exploited this family conflict.

More stories by David Corn

Terri Schiavo is dead. Whatever happens in death—resting in peace, meeting one's maker, or nothing—has now happened for her. I hope her family members—on both sides—can find their peace. I hope her husband is not hounded or hunted by extremists. I hope her blood relatives can move on. But I don't think we should forget how certain scoundrels crassly exploited this family conflict. No doubt, some of the supporters of Schiavo's parents were moved by sincere concerns and principles. But the motives of the politicians and crusaders who rushed in can be called into question. I did a roundup of the hypocrisy a few days ago, and Tom DeLay, of course, was included. But I did not bash him for playing God, which is what he did yesterday. Responding to the news report that DeLay and his family withheld life-sustaining care from his father when he was in a coma, DeLay said, "My father was on life support and dying. Schiavo is living and wants to live."

Wants to live? How did DeLay know that? Does he possess insight or psychic powers unknown to the rest of us? The Florida courts ruled that she was in a persistent vegetative state (PVS), which would mean she could not consciously resolve to live. DeLay and the parents challenged that diagnosis. Even if they were right and she was in some state shy of PVS, did that mean she wanted to stay alive? Perhaps in such a state she felt unending pain or discomfort. Perhaps she had some degree of consciousness and still did not want to live in this condition. DeLay could not know her true desires. By claiming he did, he was acting far beyond his authority as majority leader of the House of Representatives. He was bullshitting for partisan gain.

Then this morning, shortly after the death of Terri Schiavo, Randall Terry, the antiabortion activist who became one of the many spokespersons for the Schindler family, was crying on television. "It's unthinkable," he said through the tears. "The fact that Terri did not have her family with her [at the moment of her death] ... is unconceivable." Apparently, Michael, her husband, permitted the Schindlers to see Terri ten or so minutes before her death, but Michael did not let them stay in the room beyond that point. Without knowing all the details, I can only say that it seems unfortunate that Michael Schiavo would not allow the Schindlers to remain at Terri's side. But I find it hard to take Terry's tears seriously. This is a fellow who preaches (his versions of) family values but who was booted out of his church for having an affair and leaving his wife. He also rejected his daughter for being a lesbian. Yet now he cries for the plight of another family, and as he does so he demonizes Michael, suggesting Michael could not bother to be with Terri at the time of his death: "I don't think Michael would leave his common-law wife, come in there and have much grief for Terri." (Friends of Michael say he was with Terri when she died.) So the guy who broke up his own family questions the commitment of a man who could have walked away from his brain-damaged wife and dumped her on her family years ago but who stayed involved for years (and who at first spent years trying to find her effective treatments and therapies). Can you say chutzpah?

There remains much to process in the Schiavo matter. Why did so many Americans become emotionally bound to the case of this woman? Why did they care so much for this one life? Are they as concerned about the lives of civilians killed during military actions in Iraq? Or those who die in the United States because they lack access to quality health care? How far does the "culture of life" extend? (CNN broke from a noontime White House press conference on the release of a new report on WMD intelligence to return to its coverage of the Schiavo story.)

George W. Bush and the Republican congressional leaders believed it was necessary for the federal government to intervene in this case, why did they not take further action after the federal courts turned down the Schindlers' appeals? DeLay, for one, argued that the federal court decisions were an arrogant usurpation of power because, in his view, these judges disregarded the law passed by Congress. If that was indeed the case, then shouldn't Congress have appealed those decisions to the Supreme Court or passed another law? But DeLay and the others choose to do nothing—after polls showed their intervention was tremendously unpopular with the American public. So how much did they care about Terri the person as opposed to Terri the issue?

There are hundreds, if not thousands, of instances when a feeding tube is removed from a person deemed beyond hope. Do the supporters of the Schindlers, like Jesse Jackson, believe a feeding tube should never be pulled? The Schindler side has described the subsequent death as terribly gruesome. Jackson called it "crude" and "cruel." Does this mean that even someone who signed a living will should not be allowed to meet such a fate? Or, perhaps more to the point, in a case when there is no living will but a guardian makes the decision to withdraw a feeding tube (and there is no conflict among family members), should this option not be permitted? Is Jackson now going to advocate federal and state laws that prohibit the removal of feeding tubes? Does this extend to breathing tubes and other forms of care? There are many ways to keep a person alive. When I heard Jackson discuss the Schiavo case, he focused on the intrinsic value of life. So what then are the guidelines for providing care to people who are comatose, brain-damaged or otherwise severely impaired?

Perhaps with Terri Schiavo finally dead, there can be a debate—free of political exploitation and self-serving exaggerations—about these difficult end-of-life issues. But I wouldn't bet on it.

David Corn is the Washington editor of The Nation and author of "The Lies of George W. Bush: Mastering the Politics of Deception." He writes a blog at davidcorn.com

Thursday, March 31, 2005

Robert Blake and Hitler - Second acts?

from www.tvweek.com

March 28, 2005

Robert Blake's Hot Again, But Fate Is Fickle

Talent Acquitted Actor Attracts Offers and Advice

By Alex Ben Block

Movie and television offers are pouring in for Robert Blake, especially for him to star in a reality series. But he is biding his time after a four-year nightmare ended March 16 with his acquittal in the shooting death of his wife. Now at age 72, some six decades after entering show business in the "Our Gang" comedies, Mr. Blake is a hot commodity once again.

It would appear to be in the nick of time. After Mr. Blake was found not guilty of murdering his wife, he held an emotional press conference in Van Nuys, Calif. He revealed that he had once been wealthy, to the tune of a $10 million net worth, but he was no longer, due to the extraordinary cost of defending himself against a murder charge since 2001. "Right now I couldn't buy spats for a hummingbird," Mr. Blake said. "I need a job."

For now, there is no shortage of producers, promoters and others offering Mr. Blake opportunities, said veteran publicist Dale Olson, who as of last week is the only person authorized to speak on the actor's behalf. [damn, that's my career dream!]

"I've gotten calls for documentaries, for television series, for several reality shows and movie parts," Mr. Olson said. "He has made no decision what he wants to do, if anything."

He may need work, but since his press conference Mr. Blake has limited his public appearances. His single network television interview was last week on ABC's "Good Morning America," where he answered questions from Barbara Walters.

Otherwise, he is resting. "He's not ready to look at a screenplay yet," Mr. Olson said. "He wants to get his head in shape."

At present Mr. Blake has no manager or talent agent. If he does intend to make money in the acting trade again, Mr. Blake should choose his representation and his first project very carefully because it will generate tremendous publicity, said veteran publicist Lee Solters.

Finding a hit may be difficult, but Mr. Blake has other options. "Can he write a book?" publicist Michael Levine asked rhetorically. "Of course. Huge book. Huge. Is there anyone in America who won't watch him on a television show or pay to see him in a movie? Answer: yes. It would guarantee a radical amount of publicity, which would be great marketing."

"He's somebody who now, for all the wrong reasons, cuts through the clutter," said a top-level studio executive. "People are interested in him. People will watch it just like they watch a train wreck."

Seize the moment, suggested Steven Jaffe, a crisis management consultant and a veteran publicist. "Take advantage of the moment and work as much as you can," he advises. "Hire people to help you exploit yourself, and avoid reality shows."

A nonfiction show centered on Mr. Blake seems to be a popular idea, but Mr. Olson said Mr. Blake will not do that. He wants to work with the right people once he is ready.

One source said a major cable network has been pitched by several producers with ideas for a reality show starring Mr. Blake, claiming they had the right to represent him. That is not the case, Mr. Olson warned in no uncertain terms: "There are no authorized representatives who can act for Robert Blake, and he's not interested in a reality show," Mr. Olson said. "He has not talked to a soul about anything."

A survey by TelevisionWeek of broadcast and cable outlets found no evidence of other Blake projects being circulated.

Ironically, noted a prominent personal manager, before the murder charge, Mr. Blake was virtually unemployable-and almost uninsurable-in Hollywood after a long and varied career.

"Should he be on TV? Not really," said the manager. "But people are also eating bugs like sausages on TV now. I mean, it is crazy. The whole world is turned upside down."

When he began his career at age 6 in 1939, Mr. Blake was still known as Mickey Gubitosi, which was close to his birth name of Michael Gubitosi. He was also famous as the Indian boy Little Beaver in the "Red Ryder" movie series. Throughout his youth he made one movie after another, but had an unhappy home life with an abusive stepfather.

When he was in his late teens the roles grew fewer. He found work in television, first as a supporting player and then, after a battle with heroin addiction, as a star on series television. Beginning in 1974 he started shooting "Baretta," a TV series about a quirky private eye with a pet cockatoo. It had a mid-season debut on ABC in January 1975 and was an immediate hit, winning Mr. Blake his first and only Emmy award.

But Mr. Blake battled for creative rights on the show and over salary. Despite the initial high ratings, the show was canceled in 1978 after fewer than four seasons.

Mr. Blake experienced long periods of being out of the public eye, returning occasionally in the 1980s to do a guest role or a TV movie. He tried another series in 1985, playing Baretta as a priest, but it didn't click. His career was effectively over after 1986.

Producer Peter Guber said most top producers will continue to avoid him, even if he does offer a temporary marketing hook. "His star is not rising," Mr. Guber said. "If Hitler were around, there would be offers for him too. That doesn't make it wise and creative filmmaking." [Well, sir, Omarosa is a frigging idiot, but she is milking her fifteen minutes on the show where you eat bugs and will be shacking up with Steroid-boy Jose Conseco in "THE SURREAL Life" - so new? No. Not where it counts, like something made or built to last. Robert Blake will never have another movie like "Electraglide in Blue"--or will he?]

Mr. Guber, who hosts "Sunday Morning Shootout" on AMC, doubts Mr. Blake will be able to sustain a career. "He's got really serious problems," Mr. Guber said. "Anybody who thinks they are going to navigate around those problems." with a career choice is pretty dumb."

Tina Brown: America's Endless News Loop = Treadmill to Oblivion


"Remember me? I'm still here."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

You have been sent this message from William@Yahoo.com as a courtesy of washingtonpost.com

Personal Message:
What did I tell you? It is not the fifteen minutes - it is fifteen seconds.


America's Endless News Loop
By Tina Brown


Doesn't it seem like a hundred years ago that the Ashley Smith/"Purpose Driven Life" hurricane hit? Actually, that pre-Easter salvation epiphany of Brian Nichols in Smith's Atlanta apartment had us by the throat only a couple of weeks ago. Then the Terri Schiavo opinion-train came thundering down the track.

It's become downright harrowing to live in the crucible of these hourly Passion plays. The endlessly repeated tape loop of Terri's gaping mouth has become as ubiquitous as Starbucks, but it's a vision of pathos that would mortify the self-conscious Schiavo were she to see it. We spend every waking moment heart-in-mouth waiting for some fresh stranger to die, be rescued, get fired. Like the Bush economy, the culture of news has become a winner-takes-all proposition.

Only after a full 10 days had passed since the removal of Schiavo's feeding tube did it feel safe to crawl out from under the avalanche and see what else might be happening in the world. Lebanon: Everyone still upset about whatever it was they were upset about over there? Michael Jackson: Still in his pajamas? Even a superstar in the soup can't draw a crowd while the Schiavo heat is raging. If it weren't for past pedophilia allegations now allowed into trial testimony, Jackson would have had to show up at court this week borne aloft by four steroid-swollen big-leaguers to have a shot at recapturing the nation's attention.

Mainstream media types spend a lot of time complaining to each other that you can't get real news anywhere anymore. Then we go to work and spend all day pounding to death the same story as everyone else. Counterprogramming? Forget it. No one wants to take their eye off the spinning ball lest they vanish off the face of the earth, including me. (When I started my own humble talk show on CNBC I had visions of long, earnest discussions of literature. Now I bark,
"Twenty minutes on William Blake? How about five on Robert Blake.")

It's the snob thing to say that the only way to find genuine information on the box anymore is to watch the nightly broadcast of the BBC news. But that's like pretending to read the Economist. The kind of news I crave -- the BBC's admirably sober graphics, calm unchatty voices, generous dollops of detailed foreign reporting -- sends me to sleep every time. Yes, I miss the whirling graphics and eyeballs of the cable wars. Auntie Beeb now feels like she's broadcasting from Toad Hall. My electronic news tastes, I realize, have become hopelessly depraved -- and there's no going back.

Besides, there's the fun of watching the performance transformation of the news hosts. Since the edict went out that all anchors have to turn themselves into "personalities" to avoid obliteration by Fox, we now have the nightly theater of watching dependable news vessels like CBS's Bob Schieffer or CNN's Paula Zahn changing before our eyes. Five weeks ago I caught Paula in big hoop earrings and swingy new red-state hair interviewing her own mother. How will CNN's lead yeoman Wolf Blitzer handle the new personality requirements? Watch for his first stand-up in a Don Imus hat.

Despite all the evidence they present to our eyes, network news bosses still feel the need to pretend they are committed to the integrity of information. The new president of CNN, Jonathan Klein, has had a great ride with a purity shtick. He keeps giving interviews to Charlie Rose and others about how he's purging CNN of "shout fests" like "Crossfire" and replacing them with "great storytelling," but his first big move was to replace the boringly useful Headline News updates with the snorting victims-avenger babe Nancy Grace. It's working, too. Grace, whose expressive nostrils I am warming to myself, has goosed ratings by 126 percent.

It's time for the media elite -- that new cussword -- to stop moaning about this irreversible trend. It lost the fight because it wasn't elite enough. Elites are supposed to lead, but mainstream media and the conglomerates that own it are the most docile followers of all. Like the Democrats in Congress, we are a craven crowd. We go panting after the 25-to-54 demographic and the networks panic if a show devoted to foreign affairs or the world of ideas pulls down the ratings for a lousy hour or two.

The current mania for any story with a religious angle is just the latest index of the post-election angst in executive suites about the terror of being out of touch with suburban mega-churches and other manifestations of the supposed Real America. God forbid, so to speak, that anyone should stand up and suggest that Mozart might be as worthwhile as NASCAR, or that it might be as important for the soul to read Philip Roth as the hokey bromides of "The Purpose Driven Life."

Perhaps in the near future what used to be thought of as news will be not only produced but exclusively consumed by an ever-shrinking elite who feel vaguely guilty about being well-informed. Information junkies prospect on the Web for what they want to know. Everyone else will just be transfixed by the passing reality show that comes disguised as news. The only trouble is when something really big is happening out there, we are blindsided by its impact -- as when the rise of Islamic fundamentalism somehow passed us by in the '90s. Ignorance suddenly got awkward on 9/11.

The news cycle has evolved into a pattern that strobes between overkill and silence, but reality has not ceased to exist. As our eyes are exclusively focused on a hospice in Florida or an apartment in Atlanta, you wonder uneasily: What's going on beyond that wall of noise? The earthquake off Indonesia this week was like the sudden recriminating cry of the tsunami victims who lost our interest: "Remember me. I'm still here."

©2005, Tina Brown

Would you like to send this article to a friend? Go to
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/admin/emailfriend?contentId=A14556-2005Mar30&sent=no&referrer=emailarticle

WARNING! Play it SAFE! Write about things you KNOW, and that will benefit THE GREATER GOOD (home, family, community....) bye, bye jg/jg?


I went to my favorite blog-0-rama site www.AMERICABLOG.ORG, for entertainment and (to quote the self-bloviating Bill O'REILLY) "pithy" commentary, and lo and behold ~~~ HACKED?

hacked?sukabi Email Homepage 03.31.05 - 3:10 am #

Those are Blogger template tags...Why they are showing up instead of the actual content is beyond me...Its not like its only the template that is loading, because there are separate, individual posts.Weird.Forrest Email Homepage 03.31.05 - 3:18 am #

Don't think my handlers will retaliate? Fuck with me and find out. I guess you already have. JJGG Email Homepage 03.31.05 - 3:20 am #

Scrawler Email Homepage 03.31.05 - 3:38 am #

Well, I disagree, I think $BlogItemTitle$ is wrong!And what's more what's all this about $BlogItemBody$?!! We have to remember this is a free country and we must protect our right to $BlogDateHeaderDate$!Scrawler Email Homepage 03.31.05 - 3:44 am #

wtf?wtf! Email Homepage 03.31.05 - 3:52 am #

Au contraire, $BlogCommenterBeginScrawler/EndScrawler$! This is only a free country for $BlogHalliburton&Begin#FreeMoneyNoBidContracts/EndPeasantRage$!David Email Homepage 03.31.05 - 3:53 am #

For some reason it's not accessing and displaying the files in the php database. There's something wrong in SQL Town. Brian Hamilton Email Homepage 03.31.05 - 4:00 am #

What the $BlogItemTitle$ ?!!EBK Email Homepage 03.31.05 - 4:01 am #

Uh, John, in case you haven't been told, something is seriously wrong with the blog. We're getting code.ghostcatbce Email Homepage 03.31.05 - 4:03 am #

Maybe Falwell died and left the leftosphere leftless!!!David Email Homepage 03.31.05 - 4:04 am #

What the $BlogItemTitle$ ?!!EBK Email Homepage 03.31.05 - 4:13 am #

!Laszlo Panaflex Email Homepage 03.31.05 - 4:21 am #

[Uh, John, in case you haven't been told, something is seriously wrong with the blog. We're getting code.]Yeah, but it's the middle of the night where he is, so we'll have to wait till morning. tireiron chef Email Homepage 03.31.05 - 4:51 am #

some of us are up on the east coast. not that it does any good,lol.bandana Email Homepage 03.31.05 - 4:59 am #

Maybe Chris can do something...Virtra Email Homepage 03.31.05 - 5:17 am #

I think a server stuffed in some closet somewhere needs to be let out so it can reboot....S Thorens Email Homepage 03.31.05 - 5:51 am #

Of course, as of this writing, it is 6:30 AM on the east coast, and later this morning I am sure the blog will be fixed or be moved elsewhere, reincarnated, or "reinvented". [Question: was it because of the naked pictures of Gannon? Was it Gannon who did it? Or John A. posing as Gannon f--ing--er--hacking himself?]

Last night, my husband and I were watching The West Wing (as all good politico-junkies do) , and advised me when I asked 'should I rep JG?' His reply: "No one will know who he is where it matters in a couple of months. Stay away. There is nothing in it for you. Poison." [ Now of course, to me, being his handler would simply be a kick! Why are so many warning me not to go down this road? Is AmericaBlog's malady a WARNING SIGN for you, Miss Kilroy2005?]

It reminds me of that old classic radio routine that I am NOT old enough to remember:

Robber: Your money or your life?
Jack Benny: I'm thinking it over!

Wednesday, March 30, 2005

Super-freaks go MAIN STREAM, or, it's no wonder CNN covers the Blog-0-Sphere on "Inside Politics"

-->
Get Agonist Gear!

An Open Letter To The National Press
Club
-->
If you wish to be added the list,please email Sean-Paul at
seanpaul-at-agonist.org


Please note, this letter has been updated.

An Open Letter To The National Press
ClubSean-Paul Kelley San Antonio March 28
Members of
The National Press Club,

We, the undersigned bloggers, are very concerned about how liberal political bloggers are being systematically under-represented and belittled in the mainstream media, academic settings and media forums. By being intentionally excluded away from these venues, we are effectively pushed out of the discourse of opinion-leaders. The result is that the conventional wisdom about blogging, politics and journalism, as it concerns liberal blogs, becomes a feedback loop framed by the Conservatives and their media allies.
- By
Sean Paul in Media Criticism on Mon Mar 28th, 2005 at 01:59:15 PM PDT

Indeed, just a few weeks ago, The Brookings Institution hosted a panel that originally included no liberal political bloggers and yet while including numerous conservative political operatives in the event. We registered our protest and the Brookings Institution's response was simply to invite a few liberal political bloggers to attend, yet not sit on the panel, as we had originally insisted upon.

Gannon/Guckert told E&P [that] he "thinks it is a good opportunityfor [him] to speak to issues related to bloggers." He also addedthat he was, "trying to stay out there where people can see me." ~ Editor and Publisher

Today, however, we are faced with an entirely new situation that is more insult than misrepresentation. The discredited conservative media operative Jeff Gannon, neé Guckert, has been invited to sit on a panel at the prestigious National Press
Club
to talk about the scandal surrounding his access to the White House and more generally, the similarities and differences between bloggers and journalists. Guckert's token liberal counterpart will be a gossip blogger and sex comedy blogger. While we have nothing but the greatest respect for Mr. Graff and Ms. Cox we believe that neither represents bloggers who write about hard-nosed politics. And as for Mr. Guckert, he isn't a blogger, he's barely a journalist, and not a single political blogger involved with the Gannon/Guckert scandal, or otherwise, has been invited to sit on the panel to counter Mr. Guckert's arguments.

You can't make this stuff up: The National Press Club's panel onblogs and journalism includes Gannon/Guckert and Wonkette,but no liberal bloggers.
~
Lindsay Beyerstein

Therefore, we the undersigned bloggers, respectfully but firmly insist that a serious political blogger such as John Aravosis, of Americablog.org be included on the panel to fairly and accurately represent our industry and us. Mr. Aravosis has agreed to our request that he serve on the panel as our representative and is available should such an invite be forthcoming.

This situation is simply unacceptable. We will push back against the growing bias and sloppiness we see in the mainstream media as it concerns serious political blogging. If we do not we will never achieve any semblance of balance in the media. If we do not, we abdicate our ability to tell our own side of the story. If we do not we leave it to others to define us and defame us.

Please call Julie Shue or Rick Dunham at the The National Press Club and politely insist that they include John Aravosis of Americablog.org at their event. Here are there numbers: 202-662-7500 or 202-662-7501 or email at
tglad@press.org and info@npcpress.org.

Sincerely,

Sean-Paul Kelley,
http://www.agonist.org
Think Progress, Think Progress
DCMediagirl, http://www.dcmediagirl.com
E
zra Klein, http://ezraklein.typepad.com
Echidne of the snakes, http://www.echidneofthesnakes.blogspot.com
Amanda Marcotte, http://www.pandagon.net
Mark Karlin, Editor and Publisher, http://www.BuzzFlash.com
Matt Stoller, http://bopnews.com
Democratic Underground http://www.democraticunderground.com/
Lindsay Beyerstein http://majikthise.typepad.com
Shakespeare's Sister, http://shakespearessister.blogspot.com and http://www.bigbrassblog.com
Bob Brigham, www.SwingStateProject.com
Dave Johnson, http://www.Seeingtheforest.com
Matt Singer, http://www.leftinthewest.com
Kos, http://www.dailykos.com
Kari Chisholm, http://www.blueoregon.com
Steve Gilliard, http://stevegilliard.blogspot.com/
Kevin Drum, Political Animal
Crooks and Liars, http://www.crooksandliars.com/
Brian Balta, http://balta.blogspot.com
That Colored Fella, http://www.ThatColoredFellasweblog.bloghorn.com
Anna Brosovic http://annatopia.com/blog.html
skippy the bush kangaroo http://www.xnerg.blogspot.com
David Neiwert Orcinus http://www.dneiwert.blogspot.com
Julien 's List http://www.educatedeclectic.blogspot.com
General J.C. Christian, http://patriotboy.blogspot.com/
Laura Rozen, http://www.warandpiece.com/
Liza Sabater, http://www.culturekitchen.com
Chris Patil, http://www.marchingorders.org
Billmon, http://www.billmon.org
Ralph Dratman, http://newsfare.com
David (Austin Tx), http://supremeirony.blogspot.com
Ellen Dana Nagler, http://bopnews.com
Sean Carroll, http://preposterousuniverse.blogspot.com
media girl, www.mediagirl.org
Joe GiblinStephen Anderson, http://steveaudio.blogspot.com-
Kevin Hayden, American Street
Elaine Supkis Culture of Life News II
Melanie Mattson Just a Bump in the Beltway
Bill Scherr, Liberal Oasis
Kenneth Bernstein http://teacherken.blogspot.com
ZenYenta http://zenyenta.blogspot.com
James E. Shirk www.degenerateart.blogspot.com
Hugo http://hugozoom.blogspot.com/
Dennis Perrin -- Red State Son
Margaret Imber http://otterside.blogspot.com
Kerry Lutz http://www.100monkeystyping.com
Kelly B http://spacetimecurves.blogspot.com/
Carla, http://preemptivekarma.com/
Wes Flinn, Walk In Brain
Greg Turner, http://www.independentreport.org
Jeremy, http://upyernoz.blogspot.com
Dean Lawrence Velvel, www.velvelonnationalaffairs.blogspot.com
The Purple Coalition http://purplecoalition.blogspot.com/
Erik Wilson, The Generik Brand
Clif Burns www.OutsideTheTent.com
Sandra Wooten, Dallas,
TexasNico Pitney, Center for American Progress
Hughes for America, http://hughesforamerica.typepad.com/
Ben Varkentine, http://blogs.ink19.com/soundcrowd/
As I Please http://barneymac17.blogspot.com/
Lane Schwark, Dr. Laniac's Laboratory
stumpy, stumpysfindings.com
Jeff Tiedrich, Editor and Publisher, The Smirking Chimp
Ryan Pitts, Dead Parrot's Society
Paperwight, Paperwight's Fair Shot
The Farmer, http://corrente.blogspot.com
Mr. Thomas M. Fiddler, Somerset, KY 42502
Sidsel Anderson, http://www.newframes.typepad.com
Boadicea, We are the Resistance
Frederick Rhine, BeatBushBlog
Riggsveda, It's My Country Too!
John J. McKay johnmckay.blogspot.com
Larry Hosek, Silence Is Consent
ice weasel, private blog James Benjamin, The Left End Of The Dial


-->
An Open Letter To The National Press Club

Tuesday, March 29, 2005

NYT: National Enquirer by way of Fleet Street

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2005/03/29/arts/29enqi.jpg

Enquirer's British Invasion
New York Times
By DAVID CARR Published: March 29, 2005
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/29/business/media/29enqi.html

Spirits were high in the offices of The National Enquirer in Manhattan last week. A gaggle of British interlopers had taken custody of the tabloid, a SWAT team of Fleet Street meat-eaters brought in to revive the storied but now flagging checkout magazine. Not only was The Enquirer moving its main offices and production facilities to Manhattan from Florida - effectively taking the gossip magazine uptown and mainstream - but even more deliciously the paper also had a cover article suggesting that a Hollywood actor's Super Bowl celebration was a bit more super than most.

Paul Field, the Enquirer's editor and a former associate editor of The Sun, a popular British tabloid, was in particularly fine fettle, even though he was fighting a cold. A stripper and prostitute had told The Enquirer that she spent Super Bowl Sunday last month in the company of the star of a popular television show. The actor, through a representative, has denied the allegations. The Enquirer saved the naughtiest bit from the stripper's account - allegations of drug use - for the issue coming out today, the last one produced in Boca Raton, Fla.
In holding off, the editors took a tactical risk that they would not be scooped. "No, I'm not concerned," Mr. Field said, sitting at a table in his office. "No other publication would touch that story," he said, unlike in Britain, where "there would be other papers all over it."
In order to ensure a steady inventory of articles like the super Super Bowl one that will compel checkout readers to actually buy the paper, Mr. Field hired a slew of British tabloid veterans, including Paul Henderson, the former Mail on Sunday investigations editor, and Steve Dennis, the ex-Daily Mirror reporter who broke the stories about Paul Burrell, former butler to Diana, Princess of Wales.


Mr. Field, 33, will also oversee the expansion of the weekly tabloid to 72 pages from 60 pages with the April 18 issue (on sale April 7), along with the addition of Anna Nicole Smith as a columnist, not to mention the retention of Debbie Frank, who once served as Princess Diana's seer, as the staff astrologist. A section for women called "Q" that will provide how-to tips and uplifting stories about regular people will also debut.
The moves are meant to pull The Enquirer out of its circulation doldrums and help it compete with Us Weekly, Star and In Touch along with low-price service magazines like Woman's World.

"The paper has been losing a lot of circulation, and I think the company decided that I could do something about that," said Mr. Field, who took over from David Perel, an American, and is expected to deploy British-style tactics - like brandishing cash to land the big stories. It will be a long, tough slog to the glory days in the mid-70's, when The Enquirer sold four million copies a week. Gossip has been legitimized and has metastasized, spreading to every corner of the culture, and cable and network television is full of breathless updates on the tiniest doings of B-list celebrities. Readers cannot open a magazine or newspaper, including this one, without being offered tasty morsels from someone else's life. And that ubiquity has imperiled The Enquirer, one of the publications that started the modern era of gossip journalism when, in its current incarnation, it was founded in 1952.


As recently as 1997, The Enquirer had more than 2.5 million readers. But the success of Us Weekly and In Touch magazines, along with the television programs "Entertainment Tonight" and "Access Hollywood," ate into the franchise. At the end of last year, The Enquirer had a circulation of under 1.5 million, with its newsstand sales, where most of the profits lie, threatening to drop below a million.

That trend deeply disappointed its parent company, American Media, which also publishes Men's Fitness and Star magazine, among other titles. The drop was precipitous enough that the company brought in consultants from McKinsey to find out how to build a ledge. In a way, American Media has gone back to the future in search of a solution. It was a British group who three decades ago came over and brought tabloids like The Enquirer to prominence with a variety of stunts, the most memorable being the publication of a photograph of Elvis Presley in his coffin.But staffs gradually Americanized, as did their approach to doing business.

Mary Matalin scores six-fig book deal with former bosses daughter Mary Cheney (there is no such thing as ...coincidence?) CBS movie deal to follow?



DRUDGE REPORT

TUE MARCH 29, 2005 11:03:27 ET
FORMER CHENEY AIDE SIGNS CHENEY DAUGHTER TO BOOK DEAL

**Exclusive**

A former senior adviser to Vice President Dick Cheney has signed Cheney's daughter to a book deal, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned. The curious and bold first acquisition of former

Cheney adviser Mary Matalin in her new position at publisher SIMON & SCHUSTER is valued in the mid-six figures, top sources reveal.

Mary Cheney, who during the 2000 and 2004 presidential campaigns served as a top aide to her father, will write from her unique perspective as both a campaign senior staffer and as a daughter.

Her book will offer a behind-the-scenes look at the high intensity world of political campaigns. It will also offer her account of what it was like to become an issue in the 2004 presidential election A top executive at VIACOM, parent of SIMON & SCHUSTER, who asked not to be named, was initally alarmed the deal would be seen as a "Thank You" from Matalin to the Cheneys."It's so not the case," said a SIMON & SCHUSTER insider. "This was a great opportunity to secure a great political story. Period."

The deal was sealed with DC power lawyer Robert B. Barnett of Williams & Connolly, sources tell DRUDGE.


~ and ~

Matalin, editor in chief, said about her inaugural acquisition: "Mary Cheney was smack-dab in the middle of every major event at the highest level on the last two national campaigns." No need for a fact-checker on the project. Matalin, herself, was there too. [Kilroy2005 wuz here]

----------------------------------------------------------
Filed By Matt Drudge Reports are moved when circumstances warrant .
http://www.drudgereport.com for updates
(c)DRUDGE REPORT 2005

"...Modern Mass Media at least recognizes that it's no longer in the news business." Was this realization made recently?

Well, at least AlterNet has more class than AmericaBlog, although I like AmericanBlog -- soooo trashy.

"it’s clear... that the modern mass media at least recognizes that it’s no longer in the news business." BIG DEAL. Between Michael Jackson and Robert Blake, I have a grand old time!

Gannon an expert on journalism?
Gay prostitute, novice journalist, and newbie blogger Jeff Gannon is one of three panelists at the National Press Club's discussion of bloggers and journalists [next April 8th., 9:30 AM. Be there!] Kevin Hayden responds: "it’s clear... that the modern mass media at least recognizes that it’s no longer in the news business." (American Street)


Top Stories from AlterNet for March 29, 2005
http://www.alternet.org/
______________________________

Polls say Americans are going one way; the Democrats
decide to go the other way -- and the logic is what? Matt
Taibbi breaks it down. Plus, the clever folks who contribute
to Tomdispatch.com add some new definitions to our lexicon.

[MORE Gannon, and he loves it -- grab the 15 MINUTES OF FAME while you can, child!]

Finally, on Peek today, Jeff Gannon steps up to explain how the
media works -- uh, thanks, Jeff -- and the right wing's slippery
usage of 'life' and 'freedom' is clarified: "if they evoke freedom,
you can be sure they are covering up for someone's death, and
if they evoke life, you can be sure they are trying to take away
your freedoms."

http://www.alternet.org/peek/

THE DEMS: BUMS
Matt Taibbi, New York Press
With the majority of the public against the war, Democrats
have the perfect opportunity to differentiate themselves;
so why are they embracing Reaganomics and pre-emptive war?
http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/21608/

DEVIL'S DICTIONARY OF THE BUSH ERA
Tomdispatch.com
A survey of the world of pretzeled language coming from the
administration --
with thoughtful additions by Tom Engelhardt,
Rebecca Solnit, Chalmers and Sheila Johnson, and Arlie and
Adam Hochschild, among others.
http://www.alternet.org/story/21615/

THE TOM DELAY LITMUS TEST
Cenk Uygur, AlterNet
The question that the Democrats need to ask Republican
legislators in the Blue States is: Are you with Tom DeLay
or against him?
http://www.alternet.org/story/21617/

Plus, the Progress Report points out that for all his
bombastic rhetoric, it appears that Tom DeLay's
involvement in the Terri Schiavo case was tied to politics,
not principle.
http://www.alternet.org/story/21609/

[ Duuuuhhhh, you living under a rock or tree root? ]

Wall Street Journal weighs in on The Hammer --->

http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110006479

REVIEW & OUTLOOK

Smells Like Beltway The real reason Tom DeLay is in political trouble.

Monday, March 28, 2005 12:01 a.m. EST

By now you have surely read about House Majority Leader Tom DeLay's ethics troubles.

Probably, too, you aren't entirely clear as to what those troubles are--something to do with questionable junkets, Indian casino money, funny business on the House Ethics Committee, stuff down in Texas. In Beltway-speak, what this means is that Mr. DeLay has an "odor": nothing too incriminating, nothing actually criminal, just an unsavory whiff that could have GOP loyalists reaching for the political Glade if it gets any worse.

The Beltway wisdom is right. Mr. DeLay does have odor issues. Increasingly, he smells just like the Beltway itself.

Here is the abbreviated rap sheet against Mr. DeLay. First, we have the imbroglio with the House Ethics Committee, which last year rebuked him on three occasions. Among his sins: He offered to endorse outgoing Representative Nick Smith's son in a GOP primary if Mr. Smith would vote "yes" on the Medicare prescription-drug bill. (Mr. Smith declined the offer; his son lost the primary.) Mr. DeLay has since changed Committee rules so that it can no longer launch investigations on a party-line basis, and by packing the Committee with loyalists.

Next, there is the Texas business. Ronnie Earle, the district attorney for Travis County (which contains Austin), last year indicted three DeLay associates involved in his Texans for a Republican Majority political action committee for money laundering and illegal campaign contributions. Mr. Earle also will not rule out a possible indictment of Mr. DeLay himself.

Mr. Earle, a partisan Democrat, has a record of making suspect accusations: In 1993, he indicted newly elected Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison on evidence so weak the case was never brought to trial. The indictments of Mr. DeLay's associates came just six weeks before November's elections; Mr. Earle's primary aim, it seemed, was to derail Mr. DeLay's ultimately successful efforts to achieve the first Republican majority in the Texas delegation to the U.S. House since Reconstruction. Still, the "odor" stuck; last year Mr. DeLay had to fend off a stiff challenge from a complete unknown to keep what otherwise would have been his safe seat.

Finally, there are the junkets, three in particular. In December 1997, Mr. DeLay visited the Northern Marianas Islands in the company of lobbyist pal Jack Abramoff, now under investigation by the Senate Finance Committee, who just happened to be representing the garment industry there. Mr. DeLay later led a legislative effort to extend the Islands' exemption from U.S. immigration and labor laws.In May 2000, Messrs. DeLay and Abramoff took a $70,000 trip to the U.K. (including a golf outing to the St. Andrews course in Scotland) in the company of two House colleagues and some staff and spouses. Depending on which account you believe, Mr. DeLay's expenses were picked up either by an outfit called the National Center for Public Policy Research, on whose board Mr. Abramoff then sat, or by Mr. Abramoff directly, who later charged the trip to his clients, the gambling Mississippi Choctaw nation. Under House rules, members are not allowed to have their travel expenses covered by a lobbyist.

In August 2001, Mr. DeLay and several House colleagues (including four Democrats) visited South Korea on a trip sponsored by the Korea-United States Exchange Council, which has close ties to former DeLay staff chief Ed Buckham and was registered as foreign agent just days before the trip. House rules forbid members from traveling at their expense, but it is unclear whether Mr. DeLay or his colleagues were aware of the Korean Exchange Council's status at the time of their departure.

Taken separately, and on present evidence, none of the latest charges directly touch Mr. DeLay; at worst, they paint a picture of a man who makes enemies by playing political hardball and loses admirers by resorting to politics-as-usual.
'

The problem, rather, is that Mr. DeLay, who rode to power in 1994 on a wave of revulsion at the everyday ways of big government, has become the living exemplar of some of its worst habits.

Mr. DeLay's ties to Mr. Abramoff might be innocent, in a strictly legal sense, but it strains credulity to believe that Mr. DeLay found nothing strange with being included in Mr. Abramoff's lavish junkets.

Nor does it seem very plausible that Mr. DeLay never considered the possibility that the mega-lucrative careers his former staffers Michael Scanlon and Mr. Buckham achieved after leaving his office had something to do with their perceived proximity to him. These people became rich as influence-peddlers in a government in which legislators like Mr. DeLay could make or break fortunes by tinkering with obscure rules and dispensing scads of money to this or that constituency. Rather than buck this system as he promised to do while in the minority, Mr. DeLay has become its undisputed and unapologetic master as Majority Leader.

Whether Mr. DeLay violated the small print of House Ethics or campaign-finance rules is thus largely beside the point. His real fault lies in betraying the broader set of principles that brought him into office, and which, if he continues as before, sooner or later will sweep him out.

###

Monday, March 28, 2005

Gannon Part 2 - John in DC will be at National Press Club on April 8th - slugfest?


MILLENIUM APPROACHES AT NPC! ROY COHN COMES BACK FROM GRAVE AND SAYS "YOU BOYZ DASN'T FIGHT!"

from www.americablog.org ~ gossip, gossip, gossip!

"CORRECTION: The National Press Club *IS* a big MSM [Main Stream Media] whore by John in DC - 3/28/2005 03:56:00 PM

UPDATE: E&P [EDITOR AND PUBLISHER] now reports that GannonGuckert thinks he's on the panel as a blogger! Gannon told E&P he "thinks it is a good opportunity for me to speak to issues related to bloggers." He also added that he was, "trying to stay out there where people can see me."E&P has now confirmed it. It's the National Press Club itself that is hosting Jeff Gannon and Wonkette [Miss Wonkette, also a REAL BLOGGER] as either mainstream journalists or serious political bloggers (as we had reported ***DIRTY PICTURE ALERT!*** earlier today). Gannon, of course, is neither, and the same goes for Wonkette. He's a male prostitute who parroted GOP press releases, and she writes a humor blog about sex in politics that focuses mainly on ass-fucking jokes. Neither of them is a serious political journalist (and I don't believe Wonkette, whose site I love, even claims to be), and most certainly neither of them is your first choice for a panel about how serious MSM journalism differs from serious BLOG journalism. Oh, but it gets better.Now the Press Club says the panel is REALLY about (in contrast to what they SAY it's about on their own Web site) looking at the Gannon issue and how it reflects on journalism:

"The panel came together because we wanted to discuss some issues that came about from the Gannon case," said Mike Madden, a Gannett News Service reporter and a member of the Press Club's Professional Affairs committee, which is organizing the free event. "So we thought, 'why not try to get him?'"Uh huh. So you invite Gannon, a woman who jokes about butt-fucking on her blog (and we do love her butt-fucking jokes, but again, how this has to do with a serious discussion on Gannon's credentials, color me confused), [hey, YOU'RE confused?--you said intwo paragraophs that she is not a blogger, BUT! not a journo-blogger, then she is a blogger - does she or doesn't she, big boy? ] and someone from Congress Daily. Not a single actual journalist-blogger is even on the panel that will be discussing blogging-journalism, and most certainly not anyone representing the "other" side of the GannonGuckert credential issue. Look who's on the panel:

1. Gannon, who thinks he's an acceptable journalist.

2. Wonkette, who thinks we should err on the side of accepting him as a real journalist, per her own quotes to Howard Kurtz in the Wash Post, and

3. Then there's Congress Daily, whose sister publication, the Hotline, wrote a scathing editorial against our role in the GannonGuckert story.

So, the august National Press Club is holding a panel on the issues surrounding the GannonGuckert story and the only person they invite who was actually involved in the story is GannonGuckert himself.

AND EVEN BETTER, the Press Club invites 3 sources - ALL OF WHOM have already said that GG is a-okay as a journalist. Has anyone at the National Press Club taken Journalism 101? [HAVE YOU????] Or don't mainstream journalists even bother to pretend anymore about seeming fair and accurate when discussing progressive political blogs and politics? National Press Club = Big. Fat. Media. Whore. [Like Gannon. ALL WHORES. ALL THE TIME]. Who do you have to sleep with at the Press Club to get a one-sided panel like that? [duuuuuuhhhhh]

Daily Koz: Jeff Gannon, these are your lives :-)

About GANNON and his many lives (remember that kiddie Disney movie about Thomasina the cat?)

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/3/28/82111/6781

DAMN, at least he got into the WHITE HOUSE! I still credit Jeff Gannon's sheer persistence. And he has lead a varied life, and made a career and name change. Is he an operative? Only he can admit this as fact unless...and now he and Miss Wonkette and her company will be speaking at the esteemed National Press Club, on Friday, April 8th at 9:30 AM. John A. at my favorite left-weblog, americablog.org has those naked pictures of Jeff Gannon put up on the site again, and again, and again. The old gay blade is going to lose ALL credibility hiz own self, by roasting and toasting a naked Jeff Gannon. As if two wrongs make a "right", eh? And, to top it all off, they think that he has a PR FLACK booking him (trust me, he is his own flack at this point in time.)

Yes, we know, he asked a re-tread question of Limbaugh and Drudge (who doesn't? -- Ann Coulter and Laura Ingraham have made an entore career doing so!) and you
ALL (((( left winger, jealous, backbiting, gay blades that u r ! -- what the fuck - no one reads this anyway))) exposed him -- ((( tra - la! )))*

MORE ----and, they should be smart enough to let DAILY KOZ's Susan Gardner and Todd Johnston of ePluribus Median into the EOP's G A G G L E -- SusanG is a damn fine reporter, she and her posse rank up with WP's Susan Schmidt and surpass many in the Main * Stream * Media !

and now, for the good stuff:

RALPH EDWARDS MEETS TONY KUSHNER -- WHEN WORLDS COLLIDE -- BACKWARDS AND FULL - FRONTAL!

JEFF GANNON - MILLENIUM APROACHES MEETS "THESE ARE YOUR LIVES!"

by SusanG Mon Mar 28th, 2005 at 05:21:11 PSTBy Susan Gardner and Todd Johnstone Pluribus Media

The Absolutely Essential GannonTimeline: (the link is at the start of this rant!)

*January 26, 2005: The Question. The beginning of the end.*

~~~ or ~~~ piss someone off, and you too will be over-exposed on the ALL-MIGHTY internet!

kilroy wuz here, 2005




Sunday, March 27, 2005

How can I say "wait until the fat lady sings" anymore, damnit?

Trust me, fat girls have rounder tones, and better resonance.
(No, this is fallacy.)
I know something about the Roux-N-Y. I had it done on Tuesday, February 28, 1985.
Ask me what happened next...

Formerly Overweight Opera Singer Underwent Gastric Bypass Surgery

NEW YORK (AP) - Deborah Voigt, the opera soprano who was fired from a London production last year for being overweight, underwent gastric bypass surgery, her publicist said Saturday.

Voigt called the procedure, which creates a small pouch out of the top of the stomach and connects it to half of the small intestine, "a blessing," according to The New York Times, which first reported the surgery on its Web site Saturday.

Voigt's publicist, Albert Imperato, confirmed that the operation occurred but declined to discuss details.

Voigt, 44, reportedly had the surgery at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York last June, months after she was fired from a production of Strauss's "Ariadne auf Naxos" at Covent Garden in London because she could not fit into the costume for the title character.

She resumed performing seven weeks after the operation and has received positive reviews of her singing since then. She told the Times she was going public because everyone asked her about her new look.

"I felt it was time to talk about it," she said. "I don't want to be dishonest."
Voigt, who reportedly lost 100 pounds after the surgery, did not say how much she weighed, but said she now wears a size 14 dress and hopes to get down to a size 12. At her heaviest, she said she wore a size 30.


"I really still think of myself as a very big woman," she told the Times. "My mind hasn't had the opportunity to catch up with the progress my body has made in a short amount of time."

Voigt will perform April 4 in New York when she sings the role of Amelia in the first of eight performances of the Metropolitan Opera's revival of Verdi's "Ballo in Maschera."

AP-ES-03-26-05 2240 EST


--------------------------------------------------------

BACKSTORY: What happened to opera singer Deborah Voigt, and one blogger's commentary:


Scotsman.com News - Entertainment - Covent Garden sacks operatic diva because she’s too fat [ OPERA SINGER TOO FAT? This slays me! ]

A ROW about fat ladies in the world of opera has erupted after a leading soprano was sacked because of her size.

American diva Deborah Voight was booked for a June production of Ariadne on Naxos at Covent Garden but her contract was cancelled because she is too big, a Royal Opera House spokesman confirmed.

Ms Voight, who is estimated to weigh between 15 and 20 stones, (OVER 300 LBS) has been replaced by the less heavy Anne Schwanewilms. (250 LBS) Casting Director Peter Katona has defended his decision on the basis Ms Voight would not look right in the black dress he had planned for the part.

The spokesman confirmed Mr Katona’s comments to a Sunday paper in which he said: “Although Ms Voight is a wonderful singer, the costume and type of production made it not such a fortunate suggestion that she should be in it.

-->

AND GUEST BLOGGER, Pendra of Pendra's Realm


www.pendasrealm.com/diner/index.php?p=48

Fat Ladies Shouldn’t Sing

Finally.

Opera Divas and Black Women for whatever reason, think bigger is better. Mo’Nique, Star Jones (who is undergoing-----undergone!--- gastric bypass surgery), Chaka Khan, Aretha Franklin - overweight, obese women who are touting that Big is Beautiful. [ and, how! ]


I’m sorry, it’s not. It’s unhealthy and a little gross. At some point they have got to be tired of wearing tents as evening wear.


Women trying to lose weight - I applaud you. It took me 3 months to put on 50 pounds and almost two years to take it off - 10 to go, thank you. I know it’s hard. You aren’t the problem. It’s women who have ceased to care because it’s “too hard” or “too much work” or the catch-all excuse - “my man likes me big”.


Hope your man likes using a forklift to haul your body to the cemetery, because that’s where you’re headed.

[My man has already leased the steam shovel, dear. No choice--K-05]