Showing posts with label Obama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Obama. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Listening to the President speak while I Twitter...I think of a quote by Confucius



"Success depends upon previous preparation, and without such preparation there is sure to be failure." --Confucius

(((( 2009 Freshman Administration. It has my buy-in. The new brain trust has been planning... ))))

www.twitter.com/abbebuck 

# # #

Thursday, September 11, 2008

That's Entertainment! Showtime in what? 55 Days? WOW

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/09/10/mccain-ad-the-wolves-are-out-against-palin/

----now the wolves are after sarah plain, says the NY times -- from a mccain campaign ad.

meanwhile, 30 democratic lawyers were never flown into Wasilla, alaska, says the obama spokespeople

but the mccain frontmen says trust iohn fund, wsj
bill clinton is meeting with barack obama to give him some STRATEGIC advice.
And Karl Rove gave obama some in the wsj: SHUT UP!

THE POL-SOAP WILL CONTINUE ON 09-12-2008
# # #


Wednesday, September 10, 2008

P.T.A. --words of wisdom from Sylvia H.

I received an excellent new way to refer to the acronym "P.T.A." from Sylvia Hadash, a friend of mine from Manassas, VA. It's

P RESIDENTIAL

T RAINING

A RENA

and do you know what? There isn't a darn thing wrong with that! What better training ground than state and local politics, the senate, more....Hey, this nonsequitur (sic) should go on a tee shirt and bumper sticker! It makes sense.

And for anyone that says that John McCain is too old, Sylvia countered, "Ronald Reagan was 70 when he accepted the oath of office."

Yes, he was.

We have nothing to worry about.

McCain + Palin, carry on! Campaign VS Obama and Biden. And OBAMA: reminder: lipstick on a pitbull, not a pig (!)

# # #

Friday, September 05, 2008

Oprah Winfrey wants Obama. Case closed.

Watch out. Hell hath no fury like a moose herd scorned -- with lipstick!

From NEWSDAY: Five reasons Gov. Sarah Palin should appear on Oprah:

Well, I suppose the big flap of the moment has to do with Oprah and Drudge; she claims some report he filed today is bogus, and even went so far as to issue a denial; it's no big deal, really, though DRUDGE (as usual) is pumping this for all it's worth. The post claim: that Oprah's staff is divided on whether she should have Sarah Palin as a guest, with Oprah insisting that she shouldn't come on.

O went so far as to issue a denial, and she does that very very rarely - in fact, I can't even remember an instance when she has.

"The item in today's Drudge Report is categorically untrue. There has been absolutely no discussion about having Sarah Palin on my show. At the beginning of this Presidential campaign when I decided that I was going to take my first public stance in support of a candidate, I made the decision not to use my show as a platform for any of the candidates. I agree that Sarah Palin would be a fantastic interview, and I would love to have her on after the campaign is over."

Now, let me just give you the benefit of my expertise on Oprah: There's no such thing as a "divided" staff out there in Chicago. She is the Queen. They are her subjects. There are no disputes with the Queen, and that is that.

But Oprah's also in the bag for Obama and has made no secret of that either; said she, for example of his recent speech, "What I saw with Barack Obama was something that was transcendent and I felt transformational for me as a human being and for this country. And I only pray in the deepest part of my being that America will rise to this moment. And I feel that what he was able to offer us as individual citizens and as a united country was something that we have never seen before. I really, I think it's the most powerful thing I've ever experienced."
Fine, now, here are five reasons why O should have Palin on:

1.) To talk about motherhood, her family and Bristol; if you're really hung up on politics, O, then this doesn't have to be a "political" debriefing at all, per se, but a larger look at even more important issues, which your show claims to care about.

2.) It'd get a huge number. Hell yeah! Perhaps one of the biggest numbers in "O" history. This is a mercenary business, O, in case you've forgotten.

3.) It'd get the show back to that sweet spot of "relevance" and "news-worthiness." Wonderful to have all 150-or-so Olympians on Monday's season premiere, but the Olympics are old news; Palin is fresh news.

4.) Of course, it's O's right to support Obama in whatever forum she chooses, but she's simply too transcendent - her word - a cultural figure to pretend she's lil' ol' objective and non-political Oprah on her show, and yet Obama's most important supporter in the WORLD when she's not on screen. That's a silly artifice, transparent to all. Why not get Palin on and say, "OK, lady, I happen to think this guy walks on water. Now you tell me why he doesn't, and let's go at this." That would be great TV, and far better than a dreary debate between Palin and Joe Biden.

5.) O helped secure at least a million addition votes for Obama but probably lost hundreds of thousands of McCain supporter-viewers - if not more - to her show in the process. Here's her chance to say to everyone, "I have a right to support whomever I choose, and now to prove to you just how open-minded I am, here's the gun-toting mama from Alaska on the show."

Thursday, September 04, 2008

McCain tells Woodward: "Everything is F * * * * * * spin!" re: Bush WHO: and, how!

DRUDGE REPORTS :
In new book, Woodward quotes McCain: 'Everything is f---ing spin'... and McCain is correct!

You know, my blog is dedicated to S * P * I * N and consequences!

The book is by Bob Woodward, the beltway stalwart, with absolutely no sympathy for George.

from FOX NEWS: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,417064,00.html

Bush refused to grant an interview to Woodward for "Denial," but gave the author several interviews for "War Within." Such increased access did not seem to improve Woodward’s opinion of Bush.

"President Bush has rarely leveled with the public to explain what he was doing and what should be expected," wrote Woodward, an assistant managing editor at the Washington Post, in "War Within." "He did not seek sacrifice from most of the country when he had the chance. He did not even mobilize his own party. Republicans often voiced as much suspicion and distrust as Democrats. The president was rarely the voice of realism on the Iraq war."

On the other hand, Woodward acknowledged the success of Bush’s surge of additional troops into Iraq in 2007.

"Violence was down so much in a few places that some U.S. soldiers were not receiving combat action badges because there was no fighting in their area," he wrote.

Woodward notes that Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama opposed the surge, while GOP presidential candidate John McCain was “advocating more troops for years.” Woodward also quotes McCain expressing frustration with the Bush White House, clenching his fists in the West Wing and exclaiming to Woodward: “Everything is f---ing spin.”

# # #

Thursday, July 31, 2008

"The Most Famous Celebrity in the World" --McCain on Obama


------and wouldn't you know it, Paris Hilton wants to sue for the use of her "likeness" (sic) !!

Well, la-de-dah to all that! She just wants to MILK THE p.r. , BABY!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHXYsw_ZDXg&eurl


and be sure to watch this:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBn7FEtn0E8&feature=related


will . i . am and black - eyed - peas say it best:

'yes we can'

and yes we will

because it can't get any more confusing.

MCain is too little too late.

Obama's chest is too extended.


# # #

Wednesday, May 07, 2008

is it over....yet? If Russert says it's over, does a FAT lady have to sing to get her off the political stage?

Russert (Key of Bb, please! )

Our republican candidate is a shell of the man he was in 2000, before Bush ate him for lunch. And now, with gas prices soaring to $4.00, we need McCain OUT!

Eugene McCarthy has come back as a mulatto, but times have changed. They have really changed. Or have they?


it's
deja
vu
all
over
again,
yogi
bear!


1968!






# # #

Tuesday, April 29, 2008

How to throw Barack Obama under the bus -- by Reverend Jeremiah Wright

.

"I think Reverend Wright has a greater interest in his self-importance." --NEWT GINGRICH (!) to Barbara Walters on Good Morning America -- that yes, the good Rev. set Obama up! ~ That his remarks at the National Press Club were deliberate, to make Obama look bad, to deliberately hurt (read: sabotage) Barack Obama...

ENTIRE STORY HERE: http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/04/gingrich-wright.html

# # #

Sunday, April 13, 2008

Gov. Bill Richardson, LA TIMES: 'you don't transfer loyalty to a dynasty.'

CAMPAIGN '08
Why Gov. Bill Richardson didn't endorse Clinton
Photo: Shari Vialpando / Associated Press

Gov. Bill Richardson, shown here in New Mexico on Tuesday, has drawn criticism from supporters of Bill and Hillary Clinton for endorsing Sen. Barack Obama. "I was loyal," Richardson says. "But I don't think that loyalty is transferable to his wife.... You don't transfer loyalty to a dynasty."

The New Mexico governor says he was dismayed by pressure from the Clinton camp, and impressed by Obama's optimism. Besides, 'you don't transfer loyalty to a dynasty.'
By Mark Z. Barabak, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/politics/la-na-richardson12apr12,0,1175443.story?track=mostviewed-storylevel



# # #

Wednesday, January 24, 2007

Oh, how I love those Southern Boys - (Psst: I married two of them!) - My crush, Al Gore, who shoulda been prez, gets an Oscar movie nom!


That's just as cool! Hollywood meets Washington again!

I still have the autograph (in gold leaf!) you sent me in 1994, sir!
Tipper forgive me, but your husband ROCKS MY WORLD!

SEE:
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2007/01/23/D8MR39K01.html

"Al Gore "thrilled" by Oscar Nom"--AP

# # #